|
Led by the Sierra Club, 350.org, the National Resources Defense Council, the Waterkeeper Alliance, and other partners, an estimated 35,000 to 50,000 people gathered in Washington D. C. on the Sunday before Presidents Day for the Forward on Climate Rally to ask President Obama to reject the Keystone XL Pipeline. This makes this rally to protect our water and our climate the largest climate rally the U.S. has known. See Amy Goodman's Democracy Now program on what Bill McKibben founder of 350.org; Van Jones, President Obama's green jobs advisor; indigenous leaders from Canada; and others had to say at the rally.
The Natural Resources Defense Council emphasizes that the Keystone XL pipeline would lock the U.S. into a long-term commitment to an energy infrastructure that relies on dirty oil. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has estimated that Keystone XL would increase annual carbon emissions by the equivalent of having 6.2 million cars on the road for 50 years. The International Energy Agency’s World Energy Outlook estimates that Tar Sands production of 4.6 million barrels a day — far below the oil industry’s 2030 goal of 6 million barrels a day — will cause global temperature to rise by six degrees Celsius with catastrophic results. The World Energy Outlook states that "Globally, the oil industry as a whole is also lining up enough production capacity to cook the climate several times over."
Read the Natural Resources Defense Council's Report: "Why the Keystone XL Tar Sands Pipeline Is a Climate Catastrophe."
 Not only does tar sands oil create over triple the carbon dioxide as light crude oil. In an article written after his arrest a few days before the climate rally, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., President of the Waterkeeper Alliance, objected to the pipeline because it will endanger water aquifers and surface waterways. Kennedy wrote,
"The pipeline would cut through the heart of the Great Plains, land of more than 250,000 ranches and farms, putting our croplands and food producers at risk of oil spills across the American heartland. The route crosses the precious Ogallala Aquifer, where millions of Americans get their drinking water. Further, Keystone XL would cross more than 1,500 waterways, from the Yellowstone River in Montana to Pine Island Bayou in Texas."
Read his article: "Why I Got Arrested at the White House to Stop the Tar Sands.
_________
|
|
Mobilizing to Save Civilization
The New Energy Economy
Watch the 90 minute film on the internet
"The challenge is to save civilization itself," says environmentalist Lester Brown in this documentary based on his "Plan B" book. This video delivers a clear and unflinching message – either confront the realities of climate change or suffer the consequences of lost civilizations and failed political states.
Brown, together with other notable scholars and scientists, including Nobel Laureate Paul Krugman, Pulitzer Prize winner and New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman, and former Governor and Secretary of the Interior Bruce Babbitt, provide a glimpse into a new and emerging economy based upon renewable resources as well as strategies to avoid the growing threat of global warming. This is an enlightening film that takes you around the world to reveal the effect of global warming on different countries, the world wide impact, and countries' reaction and plans to confront it.
|
|
 Katharine Hayhoe, a research associate professor at Texas Tech University and expert reviewer for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, gave a presentation on climate science to Republicans for Environmental Protection (REP) members via conference call on March 9, 2010. REP members from across the U.S. participated in this call.
Download a PDF of Katharine Hayhoe's March 9, 2010 presentation, a series of slides to follow as you listen to the presentation.
Listen to the MP3 audio recording of the March 9, 2010 conference call. The presentation begins approximately 2 minutes into the 1 hour and 23-minute recording. The presentation is about 40 minutes followed by a Q and A for the remainder of the recording.
|
According to Bill McKibben, the first author to write a book on global warming, 350 is the most important number in the world. It represents 350 parts per million CO2 which is the atmospheric CO2 concentration to which the the earth's atmosphere must be reduced if life on earth is to avoid huge climate changes. At the present time, the earth's atmosphere is well past this with 394 ppm CO2.
To scientists' surprise, this 387 ppm CO2 is causing major changes in the earth's climate including rising sea levels, increasing acid in sea water, melting glaciers in the Himalayas, the Andes, and the Sierras, drought, floods and violent weather, and the spread of malaria and dengue fever. As glaciers melt and disappear, the rivers they feed will dry up too, and millions of people will be without water. According to a report by the Global Humanitarian Forum, an annual conference led by Kofi Annan, the former United Nations Secretary General, global warming is causing more than 300,000 deaths and about $125 billion in economic losses each year. Read the key findings of the U. S. Global Change Research Program.
Without a move to clean energy sources, Minnesota's CO2 emissions would continue to increase as shown in the chart below:
|
|
|
The global output of heat-trapping carbon dioxide jumped by the biggest amount on record, the U.S. Department of Energy calculated, indicating weak efforts at slowing man-made global warming by the world's largest CO2 polluters. Worldwide emissions of CO2 soared by 6%, about 564 million more tons, in 2010. Extra pollution in China and the U.S. accounts for more than half the increase in emissions, according to Greg Marland, Professor of Geology at Appalachian State University.
Source: US Department of Energy's Oak Ridge National Lab
At the time of the 2009 Copenhagen Conference, the United States and China accounted for 40 percent of world CO2 emissions. China is the world's biggest emitter of CO2 while the United States has the highest per capita emission of CO2. Neither country wants its own production to become more expensive. An article in Der Spiegel challenges the two countries to enter into competition for the best green technologies, the most efficient automobiles, and the strongest job growth in the environmental sector. See|
Stalling in Copenhagen: Chimerica against the World
The new figures for 2010 mean that levels of greenhouse gases are higher than the worst case scenario outlined by climate experts just four years ago. That scenario predicted a worst cast scenario of 10 degrees Fahrenheit during this century. Chinese emissions now exceed ours by and will be double ours by 2020 if China continues to build a coal plant a week.
|
|
James Hansen, director of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, likewise argues that our leaders must be shaken out of their complacency. He believes that the problem of global warming is solvable, but only if all nations phase out coal emissions and prohibit emissions from unconventional fuels like tar sands and shale oil. Read James's Hansen's article in the Guardian,
Is there any real chance of averting the climate crisis?
President Obama must decide whether or not to grant a “presidential permit” for Canadian company TransCanada to begin construction of the Keystone XL, a 1,700-mile pipeline from the Alberta tar sands to refineries on the Gulf of Mexico. Hansen has stated that exploitation of tar sands would make it implausible to stabilize climate and avoid disastrous global climate impacts. He stated that it would be essentially game over. The photo above shows Hansen's recent arrest for protesting against the Keystone XL pipeline at the White House.
|
|
|
 Clive Hamilton, Professor of Public Ethics at the Australian National University spoke in October 2010 at a meeting of the Royal Society of the Arts on the catastrophic consequences of climate change if the earth reaches a tipping point that leads to runaway global warming that cannot be controlled. Professor Hamilton's analysis in this 19 page paper that is taken from Chapter 1 of his forthcoming book, Requiem for a Species, is sobering and suggests an indeed grim future for coming generations if governments do not take action soon. The middle of the paper has more technical details so if you are in a hurry, read pages 1 to 5 and from the last paragraph on page 16 to the end of the paper:
Is It Too Late to Prevent Catastrophic Climate Change?
|
|
|
|
|
|
